Poll: Are you okay with these rule changes?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Yes.
50.00%
No, I would like something to change. (Post What)
33.33%
FireDog is a a bad GM cause he forgot this.
16.67%
Total
6 vote(s)
100%
* You voted for this item.

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]
#25
I don't think the rule limiting the number of pets you can have is needed. It should be common sense not to have more animals than you can take care of. What if your character's animal has offspring? Do you kill them just for the sake of this rule? It seems like a meaningless restriction to me, and should be kept on a case-by-case basis instead of a single rule.


 
  


Messages In This Thread
RE: [10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies] - by Spitfire333 - 30-03-2014, 10:33 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [11] Rules Revison [Activity Policies] ccspycrab 0 3,718 06-04-2014, 01:52 PM
Last Post: ccspycrab
  [8] Rules Revision [Stealing Rules] FireDog 9 15,879 24-02-2014, 10:22 AM
Last Post: Tigady
  [7] Rules Revision [IC Death Rules] FireDog 0 3,441 28-01-2014, 04:37 PM
Last Post: FireDog

Forum Jump:

[10] Rules Revision [In-Game and In-Character Policies]00